MINUTES
STATE
OF
The Henderson County
Board of Commissioners met for a regularly scheduled meeting at 5:30 p.m. in
the Commissioners' Conference Room of the
Those present were: Chairman Bill Moyer, Vice-Chairman
Also present were: Fire
Marshal’s Administrative Assistant
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME
Chairman Moyer called
the meeting to order and welcomed all in attendance.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Young led
the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
INVOCATION
Commissioner Williams
gave the invocation.
INFORMAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
1.
Barbara
Barnett – Ms. Barnett lives at
2.
Eva
Ritchey – Ms. Ritchey lives at
Ms. Richey was upset that there were no professional level
soccer fields in
3.
Carole
Repici – Ms. Repici resides at
4.
Jim
Wohlgemuth – Mr. Wohlgemuth lives at
·
Reduce,
Reuse, Recycle
·
Use
less heat and air conditioning
·
Change
light bulbs to compact florescent light bulbs
·
Drive
less and drive smart
·
Buy
energy-efficient products
·
Use
less hot water
·
Use
the “off” switch”
·
Plant
a tree
·
Get
a energy audit from your utility company
·
Encourage
others to conserve
5.
Stan
Dienst – Mr. Dienst lives at
Public Buildings
Transportation
o
Hybrid
cars for municipal and county use
o
More
public transportation
o
More
bike paths, lanes and racks
o
Reward
companies that organize car pooling and shorten the commuter routes and number
of
commutes by its employees.
o
Require
public school students to use the school busing system
Homes
o
Promote
an energy audit for every home owner
o
Arrange
financing for the installation of renewable energy sources
o
Support
green housing developments and city-based multi-unit private housing
New
Constrction*
o
Natural
ventilation and solar lighting
o
Passive
structural design
o
Heat
pumps for cooling and heating
o
Renewable
on-site sources of electricity generation (solar panels)
*Approximately
five percent additional construction cost which is recouped in lower energy
cost with
five years.
6.
Robert
Armstrong – Mr. Armstrong resides at
7.
Theron
Maybin – Mr. Maybin resides in
8.
Susan
Stewart – Ms. Stewart lives at
9.
Randy
Neall – Mr. Neall lives at 3033 Timber Trails in
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT OF AGENDA
Chairman Moyer requested
the addition of a Closed Session for personnel issues.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to approve the agenda
as revised above. All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner McGrady
requested discussion on Consent Agenda Item I – Improvement Guarantee –
Pinnacle Falls Renaissance (Water System).
Commissioner McGrady requested the 5 sets of draft minutes for LDC Input
dated March 20, 2007 through April 17, 2007 be pulled from the consent agenda
and moved to the next meeting.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to approve the consent
agenda as revised above. All voted in
favor and the motion carried.
Commissioner McGrady
stated that Item I related to an improvement guarantee on Pinnacle Falls
Subdivision. This subdivision sits on
Chairman Moyer reopened
the question of allowing transfer of water from one basin to another. When the
comprehensive plan was done he did not recall any discussion or thought in
regards to transfer of water between basins.
Chairman Moyer requested that Planning Director
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to approve the
Improvement Guarantee –
Minutes
Draft minutes were
presented for the Board’s review and approval for the following meeting:
January 2, 2007
Tax Collector’s Report
Terry F. Lyda, Henderson
County Tax Collector, had provided the Tax Collector’s Report dated April 27,
2007, for the Board’s review and consent approval.
Collections information
was included through April 26th for the 2006 bills mailed out on
August 18th, as well as vehicle bills.
Annual Bills G01 Only:
2006 Total Charge: $49,390,710.20
Payments & Releases:
47,487,979.29
Unpaid Taxes: 1,902,730.91
Percentage collected:
96.15%
Motor Vehicle Bills G01
Only:
2006 Total Charge: $4,534,766.03
Payments & Releases:
3,610,968.27
Unpaid Taxes: 923,797.76
Percentage collected:
79.63%
Fire Districts All
Bills:
2006 Total Charge: $5,232,707.94
Payments & Releases:
4,931,589.78
Unpaid Taxes: 301,118.16
Percentage collected:
94.37%
County Financial Report/Cash Balance Report – March, 2007
These two reports were
presented for the Board’s review and consent approval.
Non-Departmental costs
include insurance premiums paid to date for Property and Liability insurance
coverage and Worker’s Compensation costs.
These costs are being allocated out to all departments on a pro rata
basis during the fiscal year.
The current YTD deficit
in the Emergency 911 Communications Fund is due to the purchase of new
technology and equipment during the first quarter that was budgeted in the
current fiscal year and paid for from unreserved fund balance appropriated in
this Fund.
The YTD deficit in the
CDBG-Scattered Site Housing Project and the Lewis Creek Restoration Project is
temporary due to timing differences in the expenditure of funds and the
subsequent requisition of Federal and State grant funds to reimburse project
expenditures.
The YTD deficit in the
new Etowah Branch Library Project will be covered by $1,750,000 in new loan
proceeds that will be available in early May 2007.
The YTD deficit in the
Mills River Elementary School Project includes architectural fees that have
been paid on the project to date that will be reimbursed from the issuance of
debt in the future.
The YTD deficit in the
Balfour Automotive Training Center Project will be paid from sales tax refund
proceeds which have accumulated in the School Capital Projects Fund.
The YTD deficit in the
Solid Waste Landfill Fund is due to construction expenditures incurred on the
new transfer station project. The total
cost of this project is being paid from $1.8 million of unreserved fund balance
appropriated in this Fund.
Henderson County Public Schools Financial Report – March,
2007
This March report was
presented for the Board’s review and consent approval.
This report was provided
for the Board’s review and consent approval.
Western Highland Area Authority – Quarterly Fiscal
Monitoring Report (FMR) for the period ended March 31, 2007
G.S. 122C-117C requires
the staff of the local area mental health authority to provide the County
Finance Officer with the quarterly Fiscal Monitoring Report (FMR) within 30
days of the end of the quarter. The
county finance officer is then required to provide the FMR to the Board of
Commissioners at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board. This report was presented for the Board’s
review and consent approval.
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the Board of Commissioners approve the
Approval to create Chief Public Information Officer Position
Staff requested approval
to hire a Chief Public Information Officer.
A solid public information program is necessary for Henderson County
Government. The employee in this position
will be responsible for the County’s overall public information program to keep
the public, county employees, and the Board of Commissioners informed of county
programs, issues, and accomplishments.
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the Board of Commissioners establish the Chief
Public Information Officer position and authorize staff to begin recruitment
for the position immediately.
Water Line Extension –
The City of
A City of
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the Board approve the water line extension for
Improvement Guarantee –
Mr. A.J. Ball, agent for
the owner
The developer intends to
post with the County an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of at least
$704,075.00 to cover the cost of the improvements ($563,260.00) as well as the
required twenty-five percent (25%) contingency ($140,815.00). The proposed completion date for the
improvements is October 30, 2007.
A draft Performance
Guarantee Agreement was priovided for the Board’s consideration. If the application is approved, the
developers must submit an irrevocable letter of credit in accordance with the
terms of the Agreement. Once the County
receives a letter of credit in proper form, the relevant parties must execute
the Agreement.
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the Board of Commissioners find and conclude
that the request for an improvement guarantee complies with the provisions of
the Subdivision Ordinance and is approved.
Designation of plat review officers
N.C. Gen. Stat. §47-30.2
requires that all persons appointed as plat review officers be so appointed by
a resolution recorded in the Register of Deeds office. “Plat review officers” insure that all plats
to be recorded comply with the plat requirements set out in the General
Statutes.
On September 17, 1997
this Board first adopted a plat review officer resolution. This resolution also sets out certain other
procedures that all plat review officers must follow. The Board has from time to time updated its
appointments of plat review officers.
The Board needs to again
consider updating the list of those persons appointed as plat review
officers. The Planning Director and the
Land Records Supervisor recommend that Alexis Baker and Dennis Foresman be
added to the resolution, and correct Judy Gilmore to Judith Gilmore. A proposed resolution had been prepared and
was provided for the Board’s consideration in order to accomplish this
update. This proposed resolution
restates all other persons currently appointed as plat review officers.
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested:
I move that the Board adopt the proposed resolution
appointing a new list of plat review officers for
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Grants
The Henderson County
Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (J.C.P.C.) had approved funding for local
juvenile crime prevention programs.
These funds for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 in the amount of $202,985.00 are
available for this purpose through the State of
The programs approved by
the J.C.P.C. are as follows:
TOTAL $202,985.00
These grant applications
had been recommended for approval to the Board of Commissioners by the J.C.P.C.
If the Board is so
inclined, the following motion was suggested.
I move the Board of Commissioners approve the J.C.P.C.
recommendations for distribution of the FY 2008 Juvenile Crime Prevention
Program funds.
NOMINATIONS
Notification of Vacancies
The Board was notified
of the following vacancies which will appear for nominations on the next
agenda:
1.
2.
Environmental Advisory
Committee – 1 vac.
3.
Planning for Older
Adults Block Grant Advisory Committee – 2 vac.
4.
Smartstart – 1 vac.
Nominations
Chairman Moyer reminded
the Board of the following vacancies and opened the floor to nominations.
1.
Adequate Public
Facilities Task Force Charter – 1 vac.
Commissioner Young
nominated Hall Waddell. Chairman Moyer made the motion to accept the
nominee by acclamation. All voted in
favor and the motion carried.
2.
Blue Ribbon Committee on
Illegal Immigration – 1 vac.
Commissioner Williams nominated Mark
Hunnicutt. Commissioner McGrady
nominated Tom Sheppard.
The Board was polled with the following
results:
Chuck McGrady |
|
Bill Moyer |
|
|
Passed – no vote |
Mark Hunnicutt |
Mark Hunnicutt |
Mark Hunnicutt |
Mark Hunnicutt |
Mark Hunnicutt was
appointed to position #1 with four votes.
3.
Child Fatality
Prevention Team – 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
4.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
5.
Juvenile Crime
Prevention Council – 5 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
6.
Nursing/Adult Care Home
Community Advisory Committee – 4 vac.
The
Committee Chairperson Nuala Fay recommended the appointment of Joyce Mazzochi
to position #19. Chairman Moyer made the motion to accept the
recommendation by acclamation. All voted
in favor and the motion carried.
7.
Senior Volunteer
Services Advisory Council – 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
8.
Smartstart – 1 vac.
9.
Solid Waste Advisory
Council – 1 vac.
There were no
nominations at this time so this item was rolled to the next meeting.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Branch Library Extension Policy
On April 13, 1993, the
Henderson County Library Board of Trustees approved the Branch Library
Extension Policy. A subsequent addendum
to the policy was also approved by the Board of Trustees on February 8,
2007. The Library Director and Library
Board of Trustees had requested that the Board of Commissioners also review,
and formally approve the Extension.
The Henderson County
Public Library’s Branch Library Extension Policy was reviewed as follows:
BRANCH LIBRARY EXTENSION POLICY
It is the policy of the
Henderson County Library to provide library services to all residents of
The primary service point is the main library located in
A secondary level of service may be provided in
communities eight or more miles distance from the primary library. Such libraries will provide a basic
collection of books, periodicals, and audio-visual materials. These libraries will also house a basic
collection of reference materials and a basic level of programming, primarily
for young children. It is anticipated
that these libraries will be at least 3,000 to 5,000 square feet in size and
house 10,000 to 20,000 volumes. Larger
service population and demand may dictate large facilities and collections.
A third level of service may be provided to communities
that are closer than eight miles to an established primary or secondary level
library. These libraries will provide
popular book services, periodicals and audiovisual materials. Such libraries are expected to house not less
than 3,000 volumes and may be only a few hundred square feet in size.
The
The Libraries will be staffed in relation to their levels
of use. At present the library will
provide one full time paid staff for a library circulating 16,500 items each
year. A library circulating 30,000 items
will qualify for a second paid staff member.
Libraries circulating smaller numbers must be staffed by volunteers from
the community. It is required that no
library be open with less than two staff, paid or volunteer, in attendance.
Implementation of this policy and extension of new
service outlets is subject to the approval of the Henderson County Board of
Commissioners. The Board reserves the
right to approve or disapprove such requests as they may impact county
resources and service priorities.
ADDENDUM TO BRANCH LIBRARY EXTENSION POLICY
THIRD SERVICE LEVEL LOCATIONS
1) Should a third tier
service library maintain an annual circulation level of 16,500 checkouts for
two consecutive twelve months periods the Library Board may petition to
recommend the provision of staffing by the Henderson County Board of
Commissioners.
Approved by Board of Trustees on
February 8, 2007
Library Director Bill
Snyder stated that the purpose of the policy was to guide the Library Board and
the Board of Commissioners on deciding where there is a need for additional
library services beyond the facility currently available and the level of
services and support available at those facilities. At this time
Mills River Mayor Roger
Snyder commented that at the end of April of 2005 the third level library was
opened and it had done extremely well.
They have approximately twenty-two volunteers in which training and
supplies were provided by the Hendersonville Library. It now needs to be taken to the next
level. The Town of Mills River pays for
the lease, power, gas and utilities. The
Mills River Library has outgrown its space.
They were asking for monetary assistance.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion that the Board of Commissioners
approve the Branch Library Extension as presented. All voted in favor and the motion
carried.
Wellness Program Contract
Human Resources Director
Jan Prichard stated that the HR Staff had provided a detailed presentation on
the proposed Wellness Program at the April 18, 2007 Board Meeting. Staff, at that time, had requested the Board
to consider the proposal and approve the program at this meeting in order for
staff to implement the program by July 1, 2007.
Staff had also provided projections of the impact of the wellness
program on cost avoidance in the upcoming fiscal year.
Wellness Program
Administrative and Start-up Costs and Analysis of Cost
Avoidance
Wellness
Program
Health Risk Assessments ($28.90 x 757¹) $ 21,877
One-time Administrative fee for start-up
2,800
Health Registry ($1.85 x 757x12) 17,414
Educational Materials ($1.02 x 560²x 12) 6,855
On-going program administration fee ($490
x 12) 5,880
Nurse Practitioner contract ($45/hr x 20
x 49 wks) 53,900
Physician Supervision contract ($10/hr x
20 x 49 wks) 9,800
Consumable supplies³ 4,488
Initial and on-going lab testing 14,880
Minor equipment 3,900
HC Medical Office Assistant wages &
benefits ($13/hr x 20 hrs/wk) 22,481
Projected
total program costs FY 07-08 $164,575
Projected
Cost Avoidance FY 07-08
Wellness program impact
Reduction in claims expense $380,438
Reduction in office visit expense 65,596
Projected total reduction in expenses $446,034
Less projected total program costs
-164,575
Total cost
avoidance through wellness FY 07-08 $281,459
_______________________________
¹Projected
for all benefit employees
²Projected
that 74% of benefit eligible employees will require educational materials
³Projected
at 61% of program participant population
Cost
Avoidance is achieved by:
·
The
utilization of generic and O-T-C medications increases by 31%
There will be further
reductions in the 2nd year, such as no administrative fee start up,
potential for reduced costs for health risk assessments, the health registry,
educational materials, and consumable supplies.
Staff would be working toward furnishing the clinic with currently
available furniture and supplies as much as possible to further reduce start-up
costs this fiscal year.
Ms. Prichard informed
the Board that she would be monitoring this program along with HR Staff, the
Broker, Health Care Providers and Informed Health Management Company.
Commissioner Young
requested that Ms. Prichard provide the Board of Commissioners with quarterly
reports.
Commissioner Williams
questioned the cost of the facility and utilities.
Ms. Prichard responded
that no rent would have to be paid and that the plan was to use an existing
facility that is currently County owned next to the
There was discussion in
regards to the cost to the program for this space.
Chairman Moyer requested
that Ms. Prichard provide a quarterly estimate of the reduction in claims
expense and reduction in office visit expenses.
Commissioner Williams
asked what the impact would be on the county employee who uses these services.
Ms. Prichard responded
that there were several positive changes.
If the employee utilizes this service there would be no office co-pay
and they would not be required to use sick leave accrual. This is an opportunity for those who do not
have a primary care physician to have someone to go to and talk on a one-to-one
basis about their specific health care.
The plan incentive encourages the employees to use the program and
therefore they receive a discount on premiums for employee health care, if they
use the clinic. If they are not
complying their premium will increase by 8%.
This is an annual
contract that is intended to self-renew.
Human Resources, prior to renewal, will be looking at the experience and
determine if they want to renew.
Informed Health had informed Ms. Prichard that they are willing to put a
percentage of their program administrative fees at risk based on how well they
perform. If
Commissioner Williams
recommended that other providers be solicited 90 days prior to the anniversary
date of renewal.
Chairman Moyer requested
that a survey be provided to employees prior to renewal.
Commissioner Young made the motion that the Board of
Commissioners approve the proposed Wellness Program and direct staff to begin
preparing for the program to be effective July 1, 2007 and that the Human
Resources Department provide quarterly reports to the Board. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING – Rezoning Application #R-2007-01
Commissioner Messer made the motion to go into public
hearing. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
Senior Planner Autumn
Radcliff stated that Rezoning Application #R-2007-01, which was submitted on
February 14, 2007, requested that the County rezone approximately 4.87 acres of
land (PIN 9652-73-0943), located off Naples Road (SR 1534), from a T-15 (Medium-Density
Residential with Manufactured Homes) zoning district to an I-2 (General
Industrial) zoning district. The
applicant and owner is Matthew W. Dyer.
The Henderson County
Planning Board considered rezoning application #R-2007-01 at its regularly scheduled
meeting on March 15, 2007. During that
meeting, the Board voted 8 to 0 to send the Board of Commissioners a favorable
recommendation to rezone the Subject Area from an existing T-15 zoning district
to an I-2 zoning district. The property
is approximately 4.87 acres.
The public notice was
advertised in the Times-News on April 18, 2007 and April 25, 2007. A copy of the notification was included in
the packet (attachment 4) for the Board’s review. Notices were also sent to all adjacent
property owners including the applicant on April 26, 2007. Signs were posted advertising the hearing on
the subject area on April 26, 2007.
The Subject Area is
currently zoned T-15 (Medium-Density Residential with Manufactured Homes),
which was applied on May 9, 2005, as part of the US Highway 25 North Zoning
Study. The Subject Area is surrounded by
T-15 (Medium-Density Residential with Manufactured Homes) zoning including a
portion of an I-2 (General Industrial) zoning district that touches the bottom
portion of the Subject Area to the southwest.
Land adjacent to the Subject Area to the north across
The Subject Area appears
to be vacant according to the
Surrounding area uses
include agricultural and single-family residential uses to the south and west
(including a manufactured home park and
The 2020 County Comprehensive
Plan did recommend that the Subject Area be identified as an industrial
area. The Industrial Study that the
Planning Board recommended also showed this area as identified for industrial
uses. The US 25 North Zoning Study did
not recommend industrial on the Subject Area because the parcel did not
currently have access to public water and sewer as surrounding recommended I-2
parcels. There is no proposed expansion
for water and sewer to the site. Water
and sewer is within close proximity to the area. It is currently, in the draft LDC, proposed
to go to a residential zoning district.
If it were to be rezoned to industrial it would also be reflected in the
LDC map.
Staff supports the
recommendations of the US Highway 25 North Zoning Study and Draft Industrial
Study. Staff supports the recommendation
that the Subject Area is in a prime industrial location and recognizes that
although the Subject Area does not currently have access to public water and
sewer, it is available nearby on surrounding industrial properties.
Public Input
There was no public
input.
Commissioner Williams
suggested as the Board moves forward with the LDC they consider the others
tracts, the small island in the middle of the area identified as an industrial
area, as industrial also. There may be some
nonconforming uses there though residential use at the moment but it clearly should
be developed as an industrial area. It
is in close proximity to the interstate, water and sewer.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion that the Board approve
rezoning application #R-2007-01 to rezone the Subject Area from a T-15
(Medium-Density Residential) zoning district to an I-2 (General Industrial)
zoning district as recommended by the Planning Staff Report and Planning Board
and in accordance with the recommendations of the
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to go out of public
hearing. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING – Rezoning Application #R-2007-02
Commissioner Williams made the motion to go into public
hearing. All voted in favor and the
motion carried.
Planner Matt Card stated
that rezoning application #R-2007-02, which was submitted on February 14, 2007,
requests that the County rezone approximately 0.37 acres of land, located off
The Henderson County
Planning Board considered rezoning application #R-2007-02 at its regularly
scheduled meeting on March 15, 2007.
During that meeting, the Planning Board voted 8 to 0 to send the Board
of Commissioners a favorable recommendation to rezone the Subject Area from an
existing T-15 zoning district to a C-4 zoning district. The Planning Board also requested that the
Board of Commissioners consider rezoning two adjacent parcels totaling approximately
1.39 acres of land from an R-20 zoning district to a C-4 zoning district. These parcels are located to the north of the
Subject Area across
The property owner for
the other two parcels (Doris McCrain) was present. Ms. McCrain had submitted a letter to Mr.
Card saying that she would like to remain in the R-20 zoning district. She was opposed to the county rezoning her
property to commercial. Ms. McCrain’s
property is also contiguous with an R-20 residential zoning district.
In accordance with
Section 200-76 of the Henderson County Zoning Ordinance and State Law, notices
of the May 7, 2007, public hearing regarding rezoning application #R-2007-02
were published in the Hendersonville Times-News on April 18, 2007 and April 25,
2007. The Planning Department sent
notices via first class mail to the owners of properties adjacent to the
Subject Area on April 26, 2007 and the applicant on April 27, 2007 and posted
signs advertising the hearing on the Subject Area on April 26, 2007.
Planning Staff
recommends that the Board approve the application to rezone the Subject Area
from a T-15 zoning district to a C-4 zoning district. Staff does not recommend that the Board
rezone the two (2) additional parcels owned by Doris McCrain from an R-20
zoning district to a C-4 zoning district.
The Subject Area is
located in the Urban Services Area. The
Draft Land Development Code Zoning Map identifies the Subject Area as
transitioning to the R1 (Residential One) zoning district. Properties to the east of the Subject Area,
which are currently zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial) are identified as
transitioning to an RC (Regional Commercial) zoning district. Properties to the west of the Subject Area, which
are currently zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial) are identified as transitioning to
a CC (Community Commercial) zoning district.
Chairman Moyer addressed
the Board, stated that an application had been received from Mr. Kiefer. The Planning Board on their own asked for the
two additional properties. Technically
they did not have an application for the two adjoining properties.
Chairman Moyer affirmed
that the two things the Board could do would be to act on the current
application and if they were interested in doing the other (which the staff did
not recommend) they could send it back to the Planning Board. The Board of Commissioners did not wish to
send it back to the Planning Board.
Public Input
There was no public
input.
Chairman Moyer explained
to Ms. McCrain that what the Board had determined was that the application
referred to the one parcel only for the owner Chris Kiefer.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion that the Board approve
rezoning application #R-2007-02 to rezone the Subject Area from T-15
(Medium-Density Residential) zoning district to a C-4 (Highway Commercial)
zoning district. All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
Commissioner McGrady did
not agree with the recommendation of the Planning Board with respect to the
rezoning of the additional two parcels owned by Ms. McCrain. At the time the Planning Board did not know
the desires of the property owner. This
tract could be zoned either way given its boundaries. If the property owner has a preference for
the current zoning the Board should leave the parcel zoned as is.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to decline the
opportunity to start a rezoning process with respect to the McCrain tracts. Commissioner
McGrady made the motion that the Board advise the Planning Board not to
undertake a study of rezoning of the McCrain tracts. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to go out of public
hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
RECESS
Chairman
Moyer called a 5 minute recess, to change videotapes.
Storm Water Management Program
This item was rolled to
the next meeting.
CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION ITEMS
Budget Amendment
Finance Director Carey
McLelland reported that the schools recurring capital budget for the current
fiscal year is $2,839,000. Included in
this number is a total of $525,000 in one-time capital funds to purchase
furniture and equipment for the new
Commissioner Williams made the motion that the Board approve
the proposed budget amendment moving $525,000 appropriated in the General Fund
to the Schools Capital Project Fund to purchase furniture and equipment for the
new Sugarloaf Elementary School in FY 2008.
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
County Manager’s FY 2008 Budget Presentation
County Manager
All county budgets
including this one are heavily influenced despite the best efforts of the Board
of Commissioners, its management and employees.
We are subject to adverse actions by the state and federal
government. These mandates are a fact of
life and they absorb local generated revenues and right now we have no
alternative to the property tax. At the
top of the list of mandates is the Medicaid match. We have no choice at this time other than to
fund the full share. Medicaid will
absorb 10.33% of the proposed 2007-08 tax levy.
The General Assembly continues to talk about Medicaid reform but as the
budget message says “talk does not pay the bill”. Until this talk becomes action the property
tax rate of 4.88 must be levied for this program. The County is looking at an increase of 2.1
million dollars in this mandate over the last four years. The property tax base has grown on average of
3.71%. Assistant Manager Coffey had
outlined the revenue neutral tax calculation and again statutory requirement is
outlined in the budget message.
Should the Board adopt
this rate in the ordinance it will achieve the goal of limiting the growth of
Sales tax revenue again
at about 6.1% growth should be just short of $23 million with $22.9 million as
the projection.
The on-going commitments
of the school projects will increase the level of debt service by $2.148
million.
When looking at the
trend analysis, the increase of County Government operational costs have gone
from 4.17% to 13.27% to 18.61% to 3.21%
in the last five years. These are annual percentage increases for
operational costs of
The draft four-year strategic and twelve-year capital planning models are
visionary. The Board of Commissioner
leadership was commended. Mr. Wyatt felt
that Henderson County Board of Commissioners set the standard in
The enrollment projections
provided by the school system indicated a 1.68% growth in enrollment for year
2007-08. These growth projections are
included as part of the budget. The
County continues to invest heavily in debt service. This debt service for schools is about $58,500,000
and will be heading up to an excess of $83,000,000. There were several pages based on the Board
of Commissioners comments about obligations to the local school system. There is a comparison of the thirteen school
systems that have an enrollment of between 10,000 and 15,000. When looking at total county appropriation,
The County is
researching a new pay system along with a new benefits proposal that will
attempt to slow down the staggering increase in health benefit costs. Staff’s commitment is to continue to find
better ways to do this. It will be up to
the employees who use this plan to determine the fate of the plan.
The CIP is a
comprehensive document. Capital
improvement funding is funded at $15.7 million.
Outlined in the budget is a breakdown of this. One of the substantial goals of the
Commissioners informally is the establishment of a capital reserve fund. Staff is recommending $1.4 million in the
capital reserve fund. This is money to
be set aside for future projects at the discretion of the Board. This is a one time transfer primarily from
fund balance. It is not generated by
dedicated revenue stream. This would be
a perfect place for a land transfer fee to move right into the capital project
but this is not an option. During the
LDC the Board was chastised for not having a land transfer fee or impact
fees. The Board of Commissioners does
not have the authority. The General
Assembly would have to act to make that available to us.
The Strategic Plan in
regards to soccer fields includes an objective to develop a county wide master
plan for parks and facilities. There is
implementation on the environmental front for the Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Program and Storm Water Management Control. Economic Development faces specific
challenges; growth generates both cost and revenue. There has been discussion of a cost of
community services study.
STAFF REPORTS
There was nothing
further to report at this time.
There was nothing
further to report at this time.
IMPORTANT DATES
Schedule Strategic Plan/CIP Budget Meeting Workshop
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to set a workshop on
the draft Strategic Plan/CIP, followed by the draft Budget including the
Sheriff’s Department for Tuesday, May 15, at 6:00 PM in the Commissioners’ Conference
Room. All voted in favor and the motion
carried.
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to set a workshop on
the draft Budget to include Schools and
Schedule Public Hearing on the FY 2008 Budget
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to set a public hearing
on the FY 2007-2008 Budget for Thursday, May 24, at 7:00 PM in the
Commissioners’ Conference Room. All
voted in favor and the motion carried.
Set Public Hearing on New Road Names
Chairman Moyer made the motion to set a public hearing on
new road names for June 4, at 7:00 PM in the Commissioners’ Conference Room. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Set Public Hearing on Vested Rights Application (VR-2007-04)
for Matthew Cooke and
Commissioner McGrady made the motion to set a public hearing
on Vested Rights Application (VR-2007-04) for Matthew Cooke and
CANE CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT – no
business
CLOSED SESSION - The
closed session was deferred to the next meeting.
ADJOURN
Commissioner Williams made the motion to adjourn. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Attest:
_________________________________ __________________________________